October 31, 2007
October 30, 2007
falsified in the defense of poetry
Your search - "when did you know you loved her?" - did not match any documents.
Suggestions:
- Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
- Try different keywords.
- Try more general keywords.
On the relationship of the cloverleaf to the end of the world
the end is contained and trod upon
there's a cloud atop the mountain
the sand is giving way underneath my feet
tar and cement pose a response to violence
the infrastructure goads the bomb into dropping
October 29, 2007
October 26, 2007
Braveheart is one of the worst movies ever to come out of Hollywood
October 25, 2007
Eulogy for Armstrong and Aldrin, Had They Not Come Home
To: H. R. Haldeman
From: Bill Safire
July 18, 1969.
IN EVENT OF MOON DISASTER:
Fate has ordained that the men who went to the moon to explore in peace will stay on the moon to rest in peace.
These brave men, Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin, know that there is no hope for their recovery. But they also know that there is hope for mankind in their sacrifice.
These two men are laying down their lives in mankind's most noble goal: the search for truth and understanding.
They will be mourned by their families and friends; they will be mourned by the nation; they will be mourned by the people of the world; they will be mourned by a Mother Earth that dared send two of her sons into the unknown.
In their exploration, they stirred the people of the world to feel as one; in their sacrifice, they bind more tightly the brotherhood of man.
In ancient days, men looked at the stars and saw their heroes in the constellations. In modern times, we do much the same, but our heroes are epic men of flesh and blood.
Others will follow, and surely find their way home. Man's search will not be denied. But these men were the first, and they will remain the foremost in our hearts.
For every human being who looks up at the moon in the nights to come will know that there is some corner of another world that is forever mankind.
PRIOR TO THE PRESIDENT'S STATEMENT:
The President should telephone each of the widows-to-be.
AFTER THE PRESIDENT'S STATEMENT, AT THE POINT WHEN NASA ENDS COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE MEN:
A clergyman should adopt the same procedure as a burial at sea, commending their souls to "the deepest of the deep," concluding with the Lord's Prayer.
William Safire for NixonOctober 24, 2007
October 23, 2007
what a line
David (Foster Wallace) on David (Lynch)
Advice: Don't get stuck on stupid.
Either way it seems wise.
October 22, 2007
from Esquire in 2000
October 19, 2007
More on Star Wars as a fantasy.
You know where my ability to suspend my disbelief (and, by extension, my ability to enjoy the films) breaks down? It's their weapons. I don't care how cool a lightsaber is In fact, I hate how cool they are. In the context of the Star Wars universe, they're completely unbelievable.
The phrase "an elegant weapon for a more civilized time" says nothing about the utility of lightsabers as weapons. A katana's elegant. An épée is (arguably) a weapon from a more civilized time. As great as it feels to hold one of those swords in your hand, neither means shit if there's someone who doesn't like you holding a cheap pistol nearby.
Here's where I generalize: Anything popularly identified as science fiction which involves swords of any kind alongside firearms is actually fantasy. This includes Star Wars, 90% of the Final Fantasy games, a whole lot of anime, Shadowrun, and Warhammer.
There are a lot of reasons for this, but they all boil down to a fondness for romanticism and/or empty cool aesthetics at the expense of logic and accident: a desire to create dramatic confrontations in which a swordsman bests a nominally superior gunman (or, even better, gunmen) rather than allowing combat situations to evolve and occur naturally within a story. Sometimes this is due to a conservative desire to reference a "better time" and sometimes it's just because Swords Are Cooler. Either way it makes for bad, bad storytelling.
Some notable exceptions:
Dune, in which personal shields prevent fast intrusions (e.g. bullets) but allow slower intrusions (e.g. blades). This places much of the story-telling burden on defense in that anyone can wear a shield. Contrast this with Star Wars (or any fantasy story from the Eddas downward, really) in which a character must be "gifted" to wield the magic sword. I think this defensive focus makes for a much more practical explanation. Lightsabers might be difficult to wield, but that doesn't seem like it should stop anyone from trying, right? The only time you see a non-Jedi use a lightsaber is in Empire Strikes Back, when Han Solo cuts open the tauntaun. The widespread adaption of a technology that negates the use of firearms is a much more compelling idea.
use shields in this scene.
Star Wars: A
Ritual Combat
Firefly: During the series, bladed weapons are used constantly by Reavers. But rather than mystical swords that only the most privileged can wield, they're axes and crude machetes that function as slashing instruments just as much as bludgeons. They're used by psychopaths/Space Navajos/Wendigos, not "knights," while everyone else just uses rifles like sane people.
The believability of swords being used alongside guns is tested pretty severely in the film Serenity, though.
Are there other exceptions?
Am I wrong?
Wikipedia serendipity
Is there a word for the emotion I would experience if the Random Page turned out to be the exact page I was looking for? I mean besides "luck" - something a bit more modern but without the smacks of paranoia I would expect from such an intersection of private personal desire and coldly uncaring technology.
God, I love this look.
All the elements are there clothing-wise. They're like a haiku: so basic and elemental that they can either collaborate harmoniously or not at all:The tight black1970s-filthy-dangerous-New York streets/rocker jeans and leather motorcycle jacket anchor her in the traditional American cool of James Dean and Joey Ramone.
The shemagh gives her a modern, political edge to that cool. Let's face it, as aesthetically appealing as it is, the James Dean/Ramones look has been pretty defanged. The shemagh also grants her maturity, as the traditional American Rebel is not typically cognizant of international politics, much less willing to display his or her knowledge or convictions. Interestingly, this modern maturity could have been completely negated by the use of a studded belt rather than the simple black for which she opted - that's an example of dipping too far into the rocker/rebel/punk look.
Here I'm getting subjective in a way that I can't defend with critical analysis, but the faint crags that line her face also play into it. I cannot place their relevance in the same type of context as her clothing, but I have a feeling that her entire aesthetic hinges on, or is at the very least, epitomized by the fact that she is both beautiful and weathered.
The boots give her an aggressive, equine height, which, far from making her masculine, accentuates her femininity.
I could probably continue by describing the elements (I haven't even got into the pose, the hair, or the gray, wet setting) or by attempting to tie them together into a single thesis, but why bother?
October 18, 2007
It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia
It's a goddamn 3-camera sitcom with 3 sets and a "wacky but comforting" premise, but it's fucking hilarious.
When did TV entertainment stop being a joke?
October 17, 2007
Sartorial Observation Regarding Leather
New Leather means Nickelback, Christian rock, club Guidos, mid-life-crisis motorcycle-purchasers. It means Harley Davidson. It means Doc Martens bought by Reebok. It means that weird, vaguely conservative neo-mod look popularized by the downmarket brands of Calvin Klein and Donna Karan. New Leather means Calculated Insincerity. New Leather means the specific, conspiratorial co-opting of rebellion.
Old, worn leather isn't a guarantee of trustworthiness, but New Leather is a guarantee of a bad person.
Sterling on Ballard and Lem
October 16, 2007
Bene Gesserit
On Parking Structures
-Ballard
October 15, 2007
void bldgblg
It is the void.
It's the confrontation with astronomy through near-constant sunlight and the inhuman radiative cancers that result. It's the confrontation with geology through plate tectonics and buried oil, methane, gravel, tar, and whatever other weird deposits of unknown ancient remains are sitting around down there in the dry and fractured subsurface. It's a confrontation with the oceanic; with anonymity; with desert time; with endless parking lots.
And it doesn't need humanizing.
October 12, 2007
I can't articulate this properly yet because I haven't yet completed the mental exercise necessary to form the concept.
October 11, 2007
here's something clever from tvtropes.org
One of the original (and still the most useful) definitions of the difference was that Science Fiction is about the social consequences of improbable events or technologies, whereas Fantasy is just about telling a good story. While more clear-cut than most definitions, this one does place some works of fiction in the opposite category to the one they are most commonly associated with, for example Star Wars would be definitely in the Fantasy category.
October 9, 2007
October 8, 2007
gawdamit
October 5, 2007
October 4, 2007
disgraced member of the stasi
letting his hair grow from fascist buzz to sleazy neck-tickling
getting stains all over his brown shirt
October 3, 2007
Have you heard anyone play "Walkin on Sunshine" since August 2005?
Plans for Sputnik launch anniversary?
OCTOBER 4, 2007: Armed only with a 30.06 hunting rifle, the most powerful Bushnell scope Walmart stocks, and my eternal patriotism, I WILL SHOOT DOWN SPUTNIK.
October 2, 2007
October 1, 2007
here's a good way to enjoy Star Wars episodes 1 and 2:
To our generation the word ‘radicalism’ evokes images of al Qaeda, not the Weathermen. ‘Campus takeover’ sounds more like Virginia Tech in 2007 than Columbia University in 1968. Such phrases are a dead language to us. They are vocabulary from another era that does not reflect the realities of today.











